Reviving History: A Wave of Pro-Palestine Sentiment Sweeping Across US Colleges and Universities

The echoes of history reverberate through the hallowed halls of universities across the United States as a new generation of students rise in solidarity with Palestine. The recent protest on US college campuses encapsulates a phenomenon that is both deeply rooted in the past and vibrantly alive in the present.

In the 1960s, it was the Civil Rights Movement and the Vietnam War that galvanized students, transforming campuses into hotbeds of activism and dissent. Today, it is the plight of Palestine that has captured the collective conscience of the student body, sparking a wave of protests that bear a striking resemblance to those of yesteryear. These protests are not isolated incidents; rather, they are part of a broader trend of increasing political engagement among students. They represent a renewed commitment to the principles of justice, equality, and human rights—principles that are, unfortunately, often overlooked in the realm of international politics.

The recent surge in student-led protests in support of Palestine is a testament to the enduring power of youth activism. It is a reminder that change often begins with the bold and young, those who dare to question the status quo and envision a better world. The events aim to delve into this recurring pattern of history, exploring the parallels between past and present and shedding light on the significance of these protests in the ongoing struggle for Palestinian rights. It is a tribute to the spirit of resistance that continues to thrive on US college campuses—a spirit that refuses to be silenced, a spirit that demands justice for Palestine.

As we embark on this journey through time and across borders, let us remember that history is not merely a thing of the past. It is a living, breathing entity that shapes our present and guides our future. And as the events on US college campuses demonstrate, history is indeed repeating itself, carrying forward a legacy of activism and hope into a new era.

In the tumultuous year of 1968, American campuses became crucibles of dissent as student protests against the Vietnam War burgeoned, fueled by televised revelations of the dire plight of Vietnamese civilians. These broadcasts which laid bare the war's grim reality, not only sapped the nation's morale but also convulsed the presidential election process, precipitating the United States' eventual retreat from Vietnam in 1973.

The conflict in Vietnam represented a nadir in American military history—a superpower vanquished by an ostensibly inferior adversary. The human toll was staggering: over one million Vietnamese lives, predominantly non-combatants, were extinguished, alongside 58,000 American servicemen. The repercussions for the U.S. political framework were equally profound.

The crescendo of antiwar sentiment reached a pivotal juncture as the nation stood on the brink of electing a new leader. The Democratic National Convention in Chicago in August 1968 became the theatre for this drama, with Hubert Humphrey securing the Democratic nomination despite Eugene McCarthy's insurgent campaign. Yet the triumph was tarnished by the authorities' draconian measures against the demonstrators—young scholars incensed by governmental duplicity regarding the war. Officialdom demonized these youths, and law enforcement resorted to brutality and incarceration.

Echoes of 1968 reverberate in our present day, with the potential for history to reenact itself at the Democratic National Convention of 2024, slated for August in Chicago. The parallels extend to the electoral landscape, where once again, the nation's conscience is being tested. The clarion call of the '68 protesters, "The whole world is watching," resonated as a plea for the cessation of hostilities and the slaughter of both civilians and soldiers. The state's forceful clampdown not only besmirched America's global standing but was so ferocious that a subsequent inquiry by a national commission deemed it "a police riot."

Unmoved by the civil unrest, the Democratic Party maintained its pro-war stance, with its leadership castigating the student activists and pursuing punitive measures against them. In a historical parallel, the bipartisan endorsement of the Vietnam War mirrors the contemporary unified support for Israel's actions in Gaza.

In the turbulent era of the 1960s, the United States found itself embroiled in the quagmire of the Vietnam War. Democratic President Lyndon B. Johnson, whose administration escalated U.S. involvement, faced such vehement public dissent that he forwent a reelection bid. The subsequent electoral defeat of his vice president, Hubert Humphrey, to Republican Richard Nixon marked a continuation and deepening of the conflict. Nixon, in his quest for “peace with honor,” ironically sowed the seeds of his downfall, culminating in the ignominy of the Watergate scandal and his subsequent resignation.

The domestic front was no less tumultuous, with student activism persisting past the 1968 election. The infamous May 4, 1970, incident at Kent State University stands as a stark testament to this unrest. The Ohio National Guard’s lethal response to peaceful antiwar demonstrators, resulting in the deaths of four students and the wounding of nine, cast a long shadow of national disgrace. This tragedy galvanized a nationwide student strike, shuttering countless educational institutions and prompting a national introspection on the morality of the war effort.

Fast forward over fifty years, and echoes of the past reverberate in the present. America once again grapples with campus protests, now centered on the American-Israeli actions in Gaza. The response has been all too familiar: excessive force, vilification, and injustice. The parallels extend to the demonization of dissenters, who, like their Vietnam War-era predecessors, face pejorative labels—now, the incendiary accusations of terrorism sympathy and antisemitism, despite the inclusive and diverse composition of the protesters.

The toll of the ongoing conflict is staggering, with over 34,000 Palestinian lives claimed in Gaza alone and tensions seeping into the West Bank. Politicians seem to have taken a leaf out of history’s book, employing propaganda reminiscent of 1968 to undermine the protests and divert attention from the fundamental ideals that animate them.

In the current discourse, the student body has articulated a message that echoes the sentiments of the antiwar demonstrators of 1968: a resounding call to cease the atrocities and halt the bloodshed. They implore an end to the conflict that has claimed the lives of countless innocents, including women and children.

Regrettably, the response from the corridors of power has been less than empathetic. Many members of Congress, rather than addressing the students’ grievances with compassion, have taken a stance of opposition reminiscent of the political landscape in 1968. However, the dynamics have shifted; today’s political figures who are vocal against the pro-Palestinian student movement are often the beneficiaries of substantial campaign contributions from pro-Israel political action committees.

A cursory examination of the most vociferous critics among the students reveals a correlation between their condemnation and the financial support they receive from pro-Israel sources. Senator Mitch McConnell, a Republican, has branded the anti-Gaza war demonstrators as “antisemitic” and likened them to “student Nazis.” Records show that McConnell’s campaign coffers have been bolstered by nearly $2 million from pro-Israel PACs. Similarly, Senators Chuck Schumer, Ted Cruz, and Marco Rubio, who have also criticized the student protesters, have each amassed over $1 million from the same sources.

The adage by philosopher George Santayana, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it,” rings true in this context. The United States’ persistent support for Israel’s military actions in Gaza, coupled with its denial of the genocide unfolding, is poised to cast a long shadow over its political climate, mirroring the aftermath of the anti-Vietnam War protests of 1968. The parallels are striking and demand attention.

In conclusion, the parallels between the past and present are not just coincidental—they are a mirror reflecting the cyclical nature of history. The struggles of 1968 and the ongoing conflict in Gaza are bound by the common threads of human suffering, the quest for peace, and the enduring hope for a better future. As we stand at the crossroads of history, it is imperative that we choose the path of empathy, understanding, and resolution. The world is indeed watching, and it is our collective responsibility to ensure that the narrative of our times is one of progress and not regression. Let the message of the '68 protesters and the current generation be heard loud and clear: it is time to end the cycle of violence and embrace the promise of peace. The future is in our hands, and it is up to us to shape it with wisdom and compassion.

References:

Lozano, Alicia Victoria. (2024, April 26). Pro-Palestinian, pro-Israel protesters at USC find common ground: ‘It’s all about bridging that gap’. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/live-blog/columbia-protests-live-update-encampment-continue-college-negotiates-p-rcna149111

Kolhatkar, Sonali. (2024, May 8). Pro-Palestine protests: Student demands for divestment are not new. The Daily Star. https://www.thedailystar.net/opinion/geopolitical-insights/news/pro-palestine-protests-student-demands-divestment-are-not-new-3604246

deHahn, Patrick. (2024, May 4). Palestine protests mark historic moment for US students. The National News. https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/us/2024/05/03/palestine-protests-mark-historic-moment-for-us-students/

Blinder, Alan. (2024, April 22). Universities Struggle as Pro-Palestinian Demonstrations Grow. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/22/us/campus-protests-arrests.html

Nolan, Delaney. (2024, May 8). In the US South, pro-Palestinians face crackdown on campus and in streets. Aljazeera. https:// www.aljazeera. com/ news/ 2024 /5/8/ in-the-us- south-pro- palestinians- face- crackdown- on-campus-and- in-streets-2

Meckler, Laura;Natanson, Hannah. (2024, May 6). Massive pro-Palestinian college protests bring rare surge in discipline. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2024/05/06/college-protests-suspensions-expulsion-arrests/

Angel, Arielle. (2024, May 11). Campus protest crackdowns claim to be about antisemitism – but they’re part of a rightwing plan. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/may/11/us-university-protests-antisemitism-free-speech

Regan, Helen. (2024, May 3). Where pro-Palestinian university protests are happening around the world. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2024/05/03/world/pro-palestinian-university-protests-worldwide-intl-hnk/index.html